Moderation in the Method of Interpretation of the Koran

Mubasirun Mubasirun

Abstract


Broadly speaking, there are two methods of interpretation of the al-Qur'an, the classical exegetical method and the modern exegetical method. The classical method of interpretation is text-oriented and ignores context. Meanwhile, the modern method of interpretation relies on the strength of context in order to find substantial meanings that are able to answer contemporary problems. Each of the two methods of interpretation has fanatical supporters favoring one side and managing the other. Existing studies related to the problem of the method of interpreting the Qur'an revolve around three objects, namely the support orientation of one of the methods of interpretation and a comparison between the two methods. The study that the author is doing is in order to find a middle way whose ending provides a solution to the conflict between the two methods. This study finds common ground between the two methods of interpretation which its proponents contend with. The meeting point referred to is to take the middle path position in the various terms of the approach to the interpretation of the verses of the Qur'an, namely the middle path between textual and contextualist, between qath'i and dhanny, between ushul and furu’.


Keywords


Moderasi, penafsiran klasik, penafsiran modern

References


Abdalla, Ulil Abshar, (dkk.), Metodologi Studi Al-Qur’an (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2009).

Abdullah,M. Amin, “kata pengantar buku”, B. Saenong, Hermeneutika Pembebasan (Jakarta: Teraju, 2002),

Al-Farmawi, Abd. Al-Hayy Suatu Pengantar Metode Tafsir Maudhu’i, (Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2002)

Amin, Muhammad “ Prinsip Dan Fenomena Moderasi Islam Dalam Tradisi Hukum Islam” Jurnal "Al-Qalam" Volum'e 20 Edisi Khusus Desember 2014, h. 23-32

Ansory, Isnan Wasathiyyah: Membaca Pemikiran Sayyid Quthb Tentang Moderasi Islam (Jakarta: Rumah Karet Publishing, 2014),107.

Azis, Abdul “ Pembagian Waris Berdasarkan Tingkat Kesejahteraan Ekonomi Ahli Waris Dalam Tinjauan Maqaashid Shariiah” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari’ah, Vol. 8 No. 1( Juni 2016), 48-63

Bakir, Muham Abdul, Khatijah Othman,”A Textual Anaysis for The Term ”Wasatiyyah” (Islamic Moderation) In Selected in Quranic Versen and Prophetic Tradition” dalam Journal of Education and Social Sciences, Vol. 5, (October)

Dozan, Wely “ Analis Pergeseran Shifting Paradigm Penafsiran : Studi Komparatif Tafsir Klasik dan Kontemporer” Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir, Vol. 5 No. 1, Juni 2020, h. 38-59

Echols, John M., Hassan Shadily, Kamus Inggris Indonesia: An English-Indonesian Dictionary (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka,2009) Cet. 29.

Faiz,Fahruddin, Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an: Tema-Tema Kontroversial (Yogyakarta: eLSAQ Press, 2005).

Goldziker,Ignaz, Mazhab Tafsir, terj.M.Alaika Salamulla,dkk. ( Yogyakarta, el SAQ Press 2006 )

Hanafi, Muchlis et.all, Tafsi>r al-Maudhu>’i>: Moderasi Islam, (Jakarta: LPMQ, 2012), 5.

Hariyanto, Ahmad “Tafsir Era Nabi Muhammad SAW “ Jurnal At-Tibyan Vol. I No.1 Januari–Juni 2016, h.70

Hanafi, Hasan, Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an, Penerjemah: Yudian Wahyudi, Hamdiah Latif (Yogyakarta: Pesantren Nawesea Press, 2009),

Hidayati, Nur “ Beban Ganda Perempuan Bekerja”, MUWAZAH, Volume 7, Nomor 2, Desember 2015, h.108-118

Irawan, Deni, “ Kontroversi Makna dan Konsep Jihad Dalam al-Qur’an Tentang Menciptakan Perdamaian”, Religi, Vol. X, No. 1, Januari 2014: 67-88

Mahmud, Hamidullah “ Hukum Khamr dalam Perspektif Islam”, Maddika : Journal of Islamic Family Law , Vol. 01, No. 01,Juli-2020, h 28-47

Mustakim, Abdul, Epestemologi Tafsir Kontemporer, (Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2010), h. 55.

Mandzur, bnu Lisan al-’Arab (Kairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1119), 4831-432.

Junaidy, Abdul Basith, “ Perang Yang Benar Dalam Islam “ AL-DAULAH: JURNAL HUKUM DAN PERUNDANGAN ISLAM , Volume 8, Nomor 2, Oktober 2018

Ramadlon,Saed, “ The Discourse of Meaning of Jihad in Muhammadiyah Circle (A Hermeneutics Perspective), Jurnal Komunikator Vol. 11 No. 2 November 2019

Syamsudin, Sahiron, Hermeneutika dan Pengembangan Ulumul Qur’an (Yogyakarta: Pesantren Nawesea Press, 2009),

Setiawan, “ Hermeneutika al-Qur’an “Mazhab Yogya” Jurnal Studi ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadits, Vol. 17 No. 1, Januari 2016, h.69-96

Shalahudin, “ Pendekatan Tekstual dan kontekstual Dalam Penafsiran Al-Qur’an”, “ Al-Bayan: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur‟an dan Tafsir Volume 1 Nomor 2 (Desember 2016), h. 115-130

Triyana, Rumba, “ Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Juhad dalam al-Qur’an “ , Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, t.th. h. 292 -317

Zuhdi, M.Nurdin, “ Maqasyid Asy-Syari’ah Sebagai Metodologi Penafsiran al-Qur’an Alternatif Ala Jaringan Islam Liberal”, Jurnal An-Nûr, Vol. IV, No. 2, Agustus 2012, h.125-145




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/mlt.v5i2.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Salatiga

Jl. Nakula Sadewa V No. 9, Kota Salatiga, Jawa Tengah 50722
Lt. 2 Gedung Skretariat Fakultas Ushuluddin Adab dan Humaniora